PV Climate Environmental and Social Risk Management Background Environmental and social safeguards policies aim to ensure that participants’ human rights are respected and that any risks of non-intended negative impacts of projects are managed and addressed. Robust environmental and social risk management leads to better and more sustainable projects and avoids projects harming people or nature. Due to the nature of the Plan Vivo Carbon Standard (PV Climate), which focuses on participatory approaches to project development and equitable benefit-sharing, PV Climate projects already incorporate many aspects of environmental and social (E&S) safeguarding. As part of the update of PV Climate (to v5.0), The Landscapes and Livelihoods Group (TLLG) undertook an external gap analysis of PV Climate v5.0 against a selection of recognised international E&S standards, such as the IFC Performance Standards, the World Bank Social and Environmental Framework and others, with the aim of highlighting gaps between the PV Climate and international best practice in safeguarding. Where identified, gaps have been addressed. New requirements in PV Climate v5.0 and the implementation of new environmental and social risk management procedures ensure that all PV Climate projects are aligned with international best practice. Safeguarding Requirements in the PV Climate Standard PV Climate v5.0 Project Requirement 3.9 focuses on Environmental and Social Safeguards. Requirement 3.9.1 Projects must respect and observe universal human rights and freedoms for all. 3.9.2 Projects must have social and environmental objectives that are consistent with the Plan Vivo Environmental and Social Policy Framework. 3.9.3 Projects cannot include any activities on the Plan Vivo Exclusion List. 3.9.4 Project Interventions and activities in the Project Area(s) and the surrounding landscape must be screened for potential negative environmental and social risks and impacts against the Plan Vivo Environmental and Social Policy Framework. Risks of adverse impacts must be assessed and mitigation and monitoring measures put in place where necessary, as part of the project design (see Section 3.5) and throughout the Project Period. 3.9.5 Direct, indirect and cumulative social risk factors to be considered include potential negative risks and impacts on: human rights, livelihoods, incomes, cultural heritage, resource access, property rights, gender equality, vulnerable groups, conflict, population growth, child labour, forced labour and working conditions (including occupational health and safety), climate vulnerability, and any other relevant risk factors. 3.9.6 Direct, indirect and cumulative environmental risk factors to be considered include potential negative impacts on ecosystems within and outside the Project Area(s) from: invasive species, habitat loss, degradation and fragmentation, overexploitation, disturbance of water and energy supply, unsustainable resource use, biocides/pesticides, waste production (both hazardous and non-hazardous), soil degradation, air pollution, noise, land contamination, consequential development, climate vulnerability, and any other relevant risk factors. 3.9.7 Risk mitigation measures must be implemented by projects to eliminate or reduce any risks or impacts identified to a level that is acceptable to the people that are negatively affected including Vulnerable and/or Disadvantaged People. 3.9.8 If Local Stakeholders are negatively affected by Project Interventions and negative impacts cannot be fully mitigated, for example by introducing alternative livelihood activities, adequate compensation measures, developed with involvement of those negatively affected, must be provided to replace lost assets or lost access to assets. All losses must be considered as legitimate for compensation, including those based on customary and non-legal tenure and resource-use regimes. 3.9.9 Potential negative impacts on the livelihoods of Primary Stakeholders considered in the risk assessment must include direct costs e.g. from reduced access to wood or other forest products relative to the Baseline Scenario, and Opportunity Costs of foregone income from land management, labour, and use of natural resources in the Baseline Scenario. 3.9.10 If monitoring and patrolling is supported by the government, Projects must provide an MoU between the Project Coordinator and the government agency responsible for law enforcement. 3.9.11 Projects are required to disclose any negative social and environmental impacts to Plan Vivo as soon as they become known. Safeguarding Procedures To demonstrate ongoing commitments to identifying, monitoring and reporting of environmental and social (E&S) risks, projects are required to complete key environmental and social safeguards activities to be completed during project development and implementation: Pre-screening of environmental and social risks E&S screening, assessed by the Plan Vivo Foundation’s E&S reviewers Depending on the risk level of the project, E&S assessment scoping and planning Depending on the risk level of the project, an E&S assessment in the field Development of an E&S management plan (ESMP) Development of an E&S monitoring plan Validation of E&S assessment & ESMP Annual E&S monitoring and reporting Verification of E&S monitoring and reporting Final evaluation of ESMP implementation at the end of the project The below tables signpost when in the PV Climate project development and implementation process, these activities are required: 1. PIN Development and E&S activities and outputs Access the PIN Template: PV Climate PIN Template E&S activities and tools/guidance E&S outputs 1.1 Pre-screening using Plan Vivo exclusion list (PIN template) Completed exclusion list to filter out ineligible activities. 1.2 E&S screening, using the Plan Vivo E&S screening tool (PIN template) E&S screening questionnaire and report clarifying a) the project risk category; b) key potential risks and impacts; c) whether an E&S assessment is required; d) potential safeguard plans required. The E&S screening is assessed by and project risk levels are set by the Plan Vivo Foundation. 2. PDD Development and E&S activities and outputs Access the PDD Template: PV Climate PDD Template E&S activities and tools/guidance E&S outputs 2.1 E&S scoping and planning (Guidance under development). For high and moderate risk projects, an E&S assessment plan and methodology for further field work is necessary. This must be submitted to the Plan Vivo Foundation following the E&S screening. 2.2 E&S assessment and development of the Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) section of the PDD. For high-risk and moderate risk projects: An E&S assessment report submitted with the PDD; All projects are required to submit and Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) section the PDD as a result of an E&S activities based on stakeholder consultation 2.3 Development of E&S monitoring plan. E&S component of monitoring plan which will be included in annual reporting. 2.4 Validation of E&S assessment & ESMP; and completion of the Plan Vivo E&S Clearance Report. Validated PDD including ESMP; E&S clearance report. 3. Implementation and E&S activities and outputs E&S activities and tools/guidance E&S outputs 3.1 Annual E&S monitoring and reporting. E&S section of the annual report. Serious incidents are required to be reported immediately to the Plan Vivo Foundation. 3.2 Verification of E&S monitoring and reporting Verified E&S monitoring and reporting. 3.3 Final evaluation of ESMP implementation Final evaluation of ESMP implementation. A full safeguards manual with further guidance is currently under development. Please email our Projects team with any questions or queries: [email protected] < PV Climate Documentation Manage Cookie Preferences